The Choice of DPC's |
Installing a new DPC The Choice of DPC's is broken into 2 main categories, "traditional" and "non traditional" Traditional Otherwise known as undersetting, where the base of the affected wall is rebuilt and a new plastic DPC is inserted. This method is very efficient and at the same time very expensive. Also it can only be placed in brickwork or coursed stonework and is not suitable for rubble walls or random stone walls whereas non traditional DPC’s can be used in most structures. Non Traditional Otherwise known as chemical injection systems, have (prior to the conception of creams) been carried out by introducing silicones into the wall via a paraffin based carrier. This in turn is injected either under pressure or by gravity feed via bottles into evenly spaced holes drilled at the base of the wall. It is considered that gravity feed gives a more even penetration as fluid pumped in under pressure will naturally take the course of least resistance and follow any fissures or cracks in the wall. Whilst being efficient this method is time consuming, messy, smelly and more recently proven to be dangerous with a house being demolished by an explosion in South Australia due to poor safety procedures by the installer (see attached link for report in the Adelaide Advertiser here. ) DRYZONE How Dryzone Compares to other Creams on the Market
The report was carried out by the University of Portsmouth and published in February 2008. |
| Full Strength Damp Proofing |
![]() |
Dryzone damp-proofing cream has been formulated with a high concentration of active ingredient (over 60% silicone). This high level of active ingredient is necessary to ensure that. • The active ingredient (silicone) spreads adequately between injection holes - ensuring that there are no significant gaps in the treatment through which damp can rise. |

